Trend regime, momentum, risk — and what a rule-based system does about it. Computed daily by the IVEST research system. As of 2026-07-09.
1-year price (gold) vs 200-day moving average (dashed). Last close 518.26
These rules describe how systematic trend-following strategies typically operate — a framework, not a recommendation for any individual.
| Horizon | Return | Universe percentile |
|---|---|---|
| 1M | -0.3% | 30 |
| 3M | -17.5% | 5 |
| 6M | +0.5% | 36 |
| 12M | +15.0% | 47 |
Cross-sectional percentile ranks LMT against ~200 liquid US names — a stock can be "up" and still lag the tape. Persistent top-quartile momentum across horizons is the profile trend systems allocate to.
Trend regime uses the 200-day moving average — the same gate the IVEST core applies before holding leveraged exposure. Composite score = 40·(trend) + 40·(momentum percentile) + 20·(1 − volatility percentile): fully transparent. Beta/correlation vs SPY over the last 12 months. Every number regenerates daily from raw prices — no analyst opinion in the loop.
No — LMT trades -3.5% below its 200-day moving average; trend systems treat this regime as risk-off.
No page can answer that for you — but a trend system's checklist is public: regime ❌ below the 200-day line; momentum percentile 5/100; extension normal; predefined exit at 536.89. If any of those words are unfamiliar, position sizing — not stock picking — is the first thing to learn (Kelly calculator).
536.89 as of 2026-07-09 (close 518.26, -3.5%). The 50-day sits at 520.53 — the 50/200 relationship is currently a dead cross.
Annualized volatility 38%, worst single day in the last year -10.8%, worst peak-to-trough -27%. Beta to SPY: 0.10. Size positions so that this drawdown profile is survivable — see the playbook above.